Stethoscope

Medical device QMS
software, connected
to design control

Your audit evidence builds itself. ​
One AI-powered eQMS for documents, CAPA, ​
complaints, training and suppliers.

“Orcanos served as our ‘single source of truth,’ ​
seamlessly bridging R&D, quality, and regulatory teams.”

Martin Stofanko,
Quality and Regulatory Director, Adaptix
QMS · Quality processes
Complaints
Nonconformities
CAPA
Suppliers
Documents
Audits
Document control
100%
Training compliance
94%
Supplier qualification
87%
Go live in 24 days
On workflows configured
to your SOPs
One linked record
CAPA‑03
CMP‑115
NCR‑088
RISK‑12
SOP‑021

Trusted by 100+ medical device companies worldwide

G2 Medical QMS High Performer 2026G2 QMS High Performer Mid-Market EMEA 2026G2 Medical QMS Leader EMEA 2026G2 Fastest ImplementationG2 Best Estimated ROIG2 Easiest To Do Business With
4days

of auditing in a week and a half, run entirely inside Orcanos

"In a week and a half, I had four days of auditing. No back room. No binders. No scrambling. Everything was handled directly inside Orcanos."

What is medical device
QMS software?

Medical device QMS software, often called an eQMS, is the system a device company uses to control its documents, CAPAs, complaints, training, suppliers and audits, and to prove to FDA, notified bodies and MDSAP auditors that its products ​
are consistently safe and meet ISO 13485.

Most eQMS platforms stop at the quality record. Design controls, requirements and risk files live in a separate ALM tool, so the links between them are kept by hand. Orcanos puts the QMS and design controls on one data model, so a complaint, a CAPA, a requirement and ​
a test can be traced in one place.

Covers
Document control, CAPA, NCR, complaints, training, ​
suppliers, audits, management review, PMS
Regulations
ISO 13485, FDA QMSR, 21 CFR Part 11, ​
EU MDR, MDSAP, ISO 14971
Used by
Quality, Regulatory Affairs, R&D and Operations
Replaces
Paper, SharePoint, spreadsheets ​
and disconnected QMS and ALM tools
✦
Where the two weeks go

Tired of dreading audit week?

Your team isn't the problem. Your evidence lives in too many places.

01

The pre‑audit fire drill

Two weeks of exporting, ​
screenshotting and cross-
referencing to prove one ​
CAPA closed properly. Your ​
best people stop doing quality ​
work and start doing ​
archaeology.

Two weeks of senior QA time, every audit
02

The training chase

An SOP changes. Someone ​
works out by hand who needs ​
retraining, emails them, follows ​
up, then reconciles ​
a spreadsheet against an ​
HR system never built for this.

A finding waiting to happen
03

The silent expiry

A supplier's ISO 13485 certificate lapsed four months ago. Nobody noticed, because the reminder sat in the calendar of someone who has since left.

A major nonconformity
04

The broken chain

A complaint became an NCR, ​
the NCR a CAPA, the CAPA ​
a design change. Now prove ​
it when every step lives in ​
a different tool with a different ​
ID scheme.

Traceability you can't evidence
✦
The root cause

Stop being the human glue
between your systems.

Every one of those problems is the same problem. Quality records and engineering records ​
live in different systems, so every link between them has to be kept up, remembered ​
and rebuilt by a person. In Orcanos, the QMS and design controls share one data model. ​
Quality and R&D work from a single source of truth, and the links are stored as data.

24-day
Average go‑live time
30%
Reduction in compliance costs
98%
Average audit readiness score
100+
MedTech companies worldwide
Book a demo →
✦
End‑to‑end traceability

They can test you.
Watch you. Inspect you.
You're ready.

Follow one complaint from intake to audit. This is the walk an auditor asks for. In Orcanos, each step is linked to the one before it, including the step into design control.

Auditor reviewing linked quality records
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Complaints
A complaint comes in

Logged, assessed for reportability, and ​
the vigilance clock starts.

CMP‑115
NCR
It escalates to an NCR

Disposition set, lot family flagged ​
for trending.

NCR‑088 from CMP‑115
CAPA
A CAPA finds the root cause

Root cause confirmed with 5 ​
Why and linked to the FMEA risk.

CAPA‑03 to RISK‑12
Design control
Engineering sees the ​
same CAPA

The affected requirement ​
and test are flagged on ​
the design side.

REQ‑042 · TC‑88
Suppliers
The supplier is flagged

The NCR feeds the scorecard and a supplier corrective action opens.

Apex Components: Watch
Documents
The SOP is revised

Reviewed and approved with Part ​
11 signatures. Old version withdrawn.

SOP‑021 rev C.1
Training
Everyone affected retrains

Assigned by role on release ​
and tracked as it happens.

42 users assigned
Audits
The auditor walks the chain

Open CMP‑115 and follow every linked record, in order.

8 linked records, 0 gaps
✦
Modules

What does Orcanos QMS include?

Seven quality modules, plus risk and design control on the same record.

Document Control
→
CAPA & Nonconformance
→
Complaint Handling
→
Training Management
→
Supplier Management
→
Audit Management
→
Management Review & PMS
→
Risk Management
→
Design Control & DHF
→

Document control software ​
for medical device teams

Every controlled document in one system, with review, approval and training built into each release.

Release once, train everyone who needs it
Releasing a document assigns read‑and‑understood training by role and tracks it to completion.
Signatures and history auditors accept
Part 11 electronic signatures with unique authentication, full version history and audit trail.
Change control tied to design records
Each change links to the design outputs and risk files it touches, so nothing is updated in isolation.
Controlled documents
SOP‑014 Document Control
Rev B.2 · training 100%
Effective
WI‑032 Complaint Intake
Rev A.4 · 2 approvers left
In review
SOP‑021 CAPA Process
Rev C.1 · training 88%
Effective
FRM‑108 Supplier Eval
Rev A.1 · training 100%
Effective

CAPA and nonconformance ​
management software

One closed loop from a nonconformance to a verified fix, with the root cause linked to your risk file.

Root cause connected to risk
5 Why and Ishikawa analysis, linked to the FMEA line and design records it affects.
Closed only when it worked
Effectiveness checks are scheduled when the CAPA opens and must pass before it closes.
Recurrence you can see
NCR disposition and trending, with recurrence detection across lots and product families.
Open CAPAs
CAPA‑03 · Seal failure
Linked to RISK‑12, SOP‑021
Verifying
CAPA‑05 · Label mix‑up
Owner assigned · due in 9 days
Open
NCR‑088 · Rework
Lot family flagged
Trending
CAPA‑01 · Torque spec
90‑day check passed
Closed

Complaint handling software ​
with reportability built in

Complaints are assessed, escalated and reported from the same record that holds the CAPA and the design history.

Reportability decided at intake
Each complaint is assessed for reportability, and the vigilance timeline starts automatically.
Escalation without re‑keying
A complaint becomes an NCR or CAPA in one step, with the original record linked.
Trends that reach the risk file
Complaint trends feed management review and the post‑market side of your risk file.
Complaint intake
CMP‑115 · Field report
Reportable · clock started
Vigilance
CMP‑112 · User error
Not reportable · closed
Closed
CMP‑109 · Packaging
Escalated to NCR‑081
Linked
CMP‑107 · Display fault
Under investigation
Open

Training management software ​
for ISO 13485 competency

The right people trained on the right revision, and proof of it on any day.

Role‑based matrices
Assignments follow job roles, so new hires and role changes are covered automatically.
Quizzes where the SOP demands it
Read‑and‑understood sign‑off with e‑signature, plus competency checks when required.
A live view for the auditor
Compliance by department, role or person, current to the minute.
Training compliance
Quality
34 of 34 current
100%
Manufacturing
58 of 63 current
92%
R&D
36 of 40 current
89%
Overdue this week
Reminders sent
8

Supplier management ​
and qualification software

Qualification, certificates and performance for every supplier, tracked by the system.

Certificates that expire loudly
Expiry alerts escalate before the date passes, not after an inspector finds it.
Scorecards from real data
Incoming NCRs and delivery data update each supplier's score automatically.
Audits and SCARs in one place
Supplier audits, re‑evaluations and corrective actions sit on the supplier record.
Approved supplier list
Precision Molding Ltd
ISO 13485 cert valid to 2027‑03
Approved
Nordic Sterilization
Re‑evaluation due in 14 days
Review due
Apex Components
2 incoming NCRs this quarter
Watch
Verity Packaging
Scorecard 96 · no findings
Approved

Audit management software ​
for internal, supplier and MDSAP audits

Plan, run and close audits in the system your auditor will review.

Findings that can't go stale
Every finding opens a linked CAPA with a required owner and due date.
Checklists mapped to the standard
Clause‑mapped checklists for ISO 13485 and MDSAP chapters.
Auditor access to live records
Scoped, read‑only access for auditors replaces folders of exported screenshots.
Audit program
Internal QMS · annual
2 findings to CAPA
Complete
Supplier · Precision Molding
All findings closed
Complete
Design control review
1 finding open
In progress
MDSAP readiness
Checklist loaded
Scheduled

Management review ​
and post‑market surveillance

Review inputs and PMS evidence assembled from live data, not collected from five people.

All twelve §5.6 inputs
CAPA status, complaints, audits, supplier performance and more, compiled from the system.
PMS and PMCF on the same record
Post‑market surveillance, vigilance and PMCF planning tied to the technical file.
Actions tracked to closure
Every review decision gets an owner and a due date.
Review pack
Management review
All 12 inputs compiled
Ready
Complaint trend
Down 22% vs prior period
Current
PMS report · EU MDR
Annual update, evidence linked
Draft
Open action items
4 assigned · 0 overdue
On track

ISO 14971 risk management ​
linked to quality events

Risk files that update when a complaint, CAPA or design change touches them.

Requirements, hazards and mitigations linked
Traceability from requirement to hazard to mitigation is built in, not assembled.
Re‑assessed when design changes
A design change triggers risk re‑assessment on the linked items in real time.
Post‑market data feeds back
Complaints and CAPAs link to the risks they relate to.
Risk file
RISK‑12 · Seal breach
Linked to CAPA‑03, REQ‑042
Mitigated
RISK‑19 · Overheating
Design change pending
Re‑assess
RISK‑07 · Use error
Verified by TC‑31
Mitigated
RISK‑22 · Software fault
IEC 62304 class B
Open

Design control and DHF on ​
the same record as your QMS

The R&D side of Orcanos: design inputs, outputs, verification and validation, connected to every quality event.

Your DHF builds itself
The design history file builds as work happens, ready for submission or audit.
Quality events reach engineering
When a CAPA affects a requirement, R&D sees it on the requirement itself.
Engineering keeps its tools
Jira, GitHub and Azure DevOps integrations keep software work traced.
Traceability
REQ‑042
Linked to RISK‑12, TC‑88
Approved
SRS‑007
Affected by CAPA‑03
In review
TC‑88
Verification passed
Passed
DHF · Release 3.2
Compiled today
Ready
✦
Ask Paul
Which open CAPAs affect requirements in the next release?
Two open CAPAs link to requirements in Release 3.2. CAPA‑03 affects REQ‑042 and SRS‑007. CAPA‑07 affects REQ‑051, and its linked risk RISK‑19 is awaiting re‑assessment.
CAPA‑03
REQ‑042
SRS‑007
CAPA‑07
RISK‑19
Summarize this year's audit findings for management review.
Ask anything about your QMS or design record
✦
Ask Paul · AI compliance assistant

Stop digging. Just ask.

One question, answered from Quality and R&D together. ​
Most QMS assistants can only read the quality record. ​
Ask Paul works on the one data model Orcanos shares with design ​
controls, so it can answer questions that cross from a CAPA to ​
a requirement to a risk, with a link to every source record.

Answers in plain language
Ask about your QMS, DHF, risks ​
or requirements and get the answer ​
with direct links to the artifact.
Audit prep in seconds
Generate audit summaries ​
and compliance overviews from ​
live records.
Risk gaps found early
Automated detection of risks missing mitigations or verification.
Regulatory change monitoring
See which standards changed and which of your records they touch.
✦
Why medical device teams switch to Orcanos

Compliance, connected. Confidence, constant.

Get your evenings back before audit week, ​
and be the one with the answer when the CEO asks if you're ready.

24days

Live in weeks

Average go‑live is 24 days, ​
against the three to six months ​
legacy platforms usually quote.

0code

Your SOPs stay yours

A drag‑and‑drop workflow ​
builder and eForms that match ​
the procedures you already ​
had approved.

1record

QMS and ALM together

No integration to maintain ​
between Quality and design ​
control, and no second ​
vendor for R&D.

30%

Lower compliance costs

Less time rebuilding ​
evidence, reconciling tools ​
and preparing for audits.

✦
Easy to start. Built to scale.

One QMS from first prototype
to global portfolio

Some platforms were built for your first audit. Orcanos was built for every audit after that.

Startups

Reach CE marking and ​
FDA clearance without building ​
a compliance department

"We obtained both CE certification ​
and FDA clearance with Orcanos."

Ofer Levy, CEO, ZygoFix
Scale-ups

Add products, markets ​
and post-market ​
work without ​
re-platforming

"As a startup, their attention helped ​
us transition smoothly into the digital world."

Naum Muchnik, VP R&D, IceCure
Enterprise

Put Quality and R&D ​
on one record across sites ​
and product lines

Trusted by teams at GE HealthCare, ​
Medtronic and PerkinElmer
.

How Orcanos QMS compares

Most teams come to us from spreadsheets and SharePoint, ​
a legacy QMS, or a QMS and an ALM tool stitched together.

Capability
Orcanos
Separate QMS and ALM
Legacy QMS
Excel or SharePoint
QMS and design controls on one data model
Yes
No
No
No
Complaint to design change traceability
in one record
Yes
Manual
No
Manual
Go live in under 30 days
Yes
No
3 to 6 months
DIY
Training assigned automatically
on document release
Yes
Some
Yes
No
AI assistant across quality and design data
Yes
Some
No
No
No-code workflows configured to your SOPs
Yes
No
No
No
ISO 13485, IEC 62304 and ISO 14971 support
Yes
Yes
Yes
No

Connected to the tools
engineering already uses

Software teams keep working in their own tools. Orcanos syncs their work into the design and quality record, so traceability holds for software-driven devices and SaMD.

Jira
GitHub
Azure DevOps

Built for the regulations
you're audited against

ISO 13485
FDA QMSR
21 CFR Part 11
EU MDR 2017/745
MDSAP
ISO 14971
IEC 62304
EU GMP Annex 11
✦
FAQ

Frequently asked questions about
medical device QMS software

Choosing a medical device QMS

What is the best QMS software for medical devices?

The best medical device QMS is one built for ISO 13485 and FDA QMSR, validated for 21 CFR Part 11, and able to trace quality events back to design controls and risk. If your R&D team works in a separate tool, look for a platform that keeps QMS and design control on one data model, as Orcanos does, so traceability doesn't depend on manual syncing.

What is medical device QMS software?

Medical device QMS software, often called an eQMS, is the system a device company uses to control documents, CAPAs, complaints, training, suppliers and audits, and to prove to regulators that its products consistently meet ISO 13485 and applicable regulations.

What is the difference between a QMS and an eQMS?

A QMS is the set of processes and records a company uses to manage quality. An eQMS runs that QMS in software instead of paper, shared drives and spreadsheets, with controlled records, approvals, electronic signatures and audit trails in one system.

What is the difference between a QMS and ALM, and why connect them?

A QMS manages quality processes such as CAPA, complaints and training. ALM manages product development: requirements, design controls, risk and testing. When they are separate, every link between a quality event and a design decision is kept by hand. Orcanos runs both on one data model, so those links are maintained automatically.

Do I need a QMS before my product launches?

Yes. ISO 13485 and FDA's QMSR require design controls during development, and notified bodies audit your QMS before CE marking. Starting with an eQMS early means your design history file builds as you work instead of being reconstructed before submission.

Why can't we keep running our QMS in Excel and SharePoint?

Spreadsheets and shared drives don't enforce approvals, electronic signatures or audit trails, and they can't link a complaint to its CAPA, document change and training. Teams end up spending around two weeks of senior QA time rebuilding that evidence before every audit.

Why choose a medical device-specific QMS over a general one?

General QMS tools serve many industries and leave device-specific requirements such as design controls, ISO 14971 risk management, vigilance reporting and MDSAP to configuration or add‑ons. A medical device QMS includes them from the start.

Orcanos QMS

How is Orcanos different from other medical device QMS platforms?

Orcanos keeps the QMS and design controls (ALM) on one data model, so a complaint, CAPA, requirement, risk and test are traceable in one record. It goes live in 24 days on average and is configured around your existing SOPs with no‑code workflows.

Does Orcanos support ISO 13485, EU MDR and MDSAP?

Yes. Orcanos QMS covers the ISO 13485 quality system processes, EU MDR post‑market surveillance and vigilance records, and MDSAP audit programs with checklists mapped to MDSAP chapters.

Is Orcanos compliant with 21 CFR Part 11?

Orcanos provides 21 CFR Part 11 electronic signatures with unique user authentication, version history and full audit trails for controlled records.

What is FDA's QMSR and does Orcanos support it?

The Quality Management System Regulation took effect on February 2, 2026 and incorporates ISO 13485:2016 into 21 CFR 820. Because Orcanos QMS is structured around ISO 13485 processes, it supports the QMSR framework.

How does CAPA management work in Orcanos?

A complaint, NCR or audit finding opens a CAPA with an owner and due date. Root cause analysis, corrective actions, document revisions and training all link to it, and an effectiveness check must pass before the CAPA can close.

What is Ask Paul?

Ask Paul is the AI compliance assistant built into Orcanos. It answers questions in plain language across your quality and design records, with links to each source record, and generates audit summaries, detects risk gaps and monitors regulatory changes.

Does Orcanos integrate with Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps?

Yes. Engineering teams can keep working in Jira, GitHub or Azure DevOps while their work stays traced in the Orcanos design and quality record.

Is Orcanos suitable for early-stage startups?

Yes. ZygoFix obtained both CE certification and FDA clearance with Orcanos, and IceCure started on it as a startup. The same system supports post‑market and multi-product work as you grow.

Implementation and cost

How long does it take to implement Orcanos QMS?

The average go‑live time is 24 days, compared with the three to six months many legacy QMS platforms quote.

What if our workflow doesn't match yours?

It doesn't have to. Workflows, form fields and access rules are configured in a drag‑and‑drop builder around the SOPs you already have approved, with no developers needed.

Can we migrate from our current QMS or from paper?

Yes, you can seamlessly migrate to Orcanos whether you are transitioning from a legacy electronic QMS or moving away from paper-based binders. Orcanos provides dedicated migration tools and smart import interfaces to bulk-transfer your data to Orcanos while preserving the correct record structure.

Who handles software validation?

Orcanos provides an off-the-shelf, full Validation Package that ensures the system meets all functional and regulatory requirements, including compliance with 21 CFR Part 11.

How do I justify the cost of an eQMS to leadership?

Start with what the current setup costs: about two weeks of senior QA time before every audit, repeated data gathering for each management review, and the risk of findings from broken traceability. Orcanos customers see an average 30% reduction in compliance costs and go live in 24 days.

Walk into your next audit
calm.

Bring us your worst quality process. Tell us how it runs today: the tools, the handoffs, the step that eats your week. That's the 30-minute discovery call. If Orcanos is a fit, the second call is a live demo built on that exact process.